Selasa, 24 Juni 2008

Save Our Lake campaign

by Jenn K.

I hope more peope in the Chicagoland area are aware of this and help stop the pollution of our beautiful lake and water supply....The Chicago Park District and the City of Chicago announced plans for a petition drive on local beaches to save the lakefront from industrial sludge. The Park District and the City are urging concerned citizens to sign a petition to "Save Our Lake."In addition, the Park District is asking for volunteers to come out to the 14 locations along the City of Chicago's entire Lakefront this Saturday and Sunday, July 21 and 22 from 9am to 1pm to sign petitions and/or volunteer to get more signatures.BP's oil refinery in Whiting, Indiana, located just three miles from the beaches of Illinois's Calumet Park has been granted a permit to dump 1,500 pounds of ammonia and 5,000 pounds of toxic sludge DAILY into Lake Michigan.For years, no other company has been allowed to increase dumping in the lake. It's essential - for the health of the lake as well as 3 million Illinoisans who drink its waters daily - that Indiana's Department of Environmental Management and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency withdraw this permit immediately. On Saturday and Sunday, July 21 & 22 from 9 a.m. - 1 p.m., the Chicago Park District & City of Chicago will be staging a volunteer effort along the City of Chicago's entire Lakefront to "Save Our Lake." The following is a list of 14 locations that will be staging the volunteer effort to "Save Our Lake":
Loyola Park, 1230 W. Greenleaf Ave.
Foster Avenue Beach, 5200 North and the lake
Montrose Beach, 4400 North and the lake
North Avenue Beach, 1603 N. Lake Shore Drive
Oak Street Beach, 1000 North and the lake
Navy Pier
Buckingham Fountain, Congress Parkway and Columbus Drive
Museum Campus (12th Street Beach)
31st Street Beach, 3100 South and the lake
57th Street/Museum of Science and Industry, 5700 South and the lake
63rd Street Beach, 6300 South and the lake
South Shore Cultural Center, 7059 S. South Shore Dr.
Rainbow Beach, 3111 E. 77th St.
Calumet, 9801 S. Ave. GFor more information about how you can help "Save Our Lake" please call (312) 742-4775 or email at janis.taylor@chicagoparkdistrict.com.

Fair trade for British farmers

Fair trade for British farmers
This year Waitrose is supporting a campaign with Country Living magazine and Farmers Guardian newspaper entitled "Fair trade for British farmers".

The campaign highlights that although many of us now chose to buy ethically traded products, these principles need to be extended to domestic farming.
From the lush pasture of Devon to the dry-stone walls of the Yorkshire Dales, farming has shaped the countryside we know and love. Yet, with just 18 per cent of us choosing to buy British-produced food, thousands of farms and livelihoods have been lost and our unique landscape further endangered. The campaign slogan "no cows = no countryside" seeks to reinforce the message that we need to give British farmers and our countryside the future they deserve.
One of the key elements to achieving this is that the farmer receives a decent price for his produce. By applying the principles of fair trade to British farmers this could be guaranteed. In a nutshell: How many of us have made a cup of coffee smug in the knowledge that a producer in Kenya has been paid a fair price for it but when we added the milk, didn’t give a second thought to the farmer is Sussex who is going under because he isn’t receiving enough to cover even his costs of production?
At Waitrose, we believe that few things in life are more important than the food people buy. We are adamant that the availability of good, healthy food is not just essential but also one of life’s great pleasures. Therefore farmers, as the food producers, deserve our passionate support through fair prices and respect.
The Fair Trade for British Farmers campaign was launched during Fair Trade Fortnight 2007 and focuses particularly on Lamb, Beef and Dairy - the farming that has shaped Britain’s countryside - to illustrate both the problem and examples of good practice. Some of Waitrose’s own farmers are participating in features in the magazine and online on the dedicated website www.fairtradeforbritishfarmers.co.uk .

How Our Food Choices can Help Save the Environment

by Steve Boyan, PhD

The Union of Concerned Scientists says there are two things people can do to most help the environment. The first is to drive a fuel-efficient automobile (that means, not an SUV or a truck) and live near where we work. The second is to not eat beef.
I’m going to go one step farther than UCS: I suggest that you refuse to eat any animal or animal product produced on a factory farm. And I’m going to tell you why.
In 1990, when I first read that 10 people could be fed with the grain that you would feed a cow that would be turned into food for one person, I was impressed. But I was not moved. The reason: If 10 people would be fed because I gave up meat, I’d give it up. But, I thought, if I give up meat, it won’t have that impact: it probably won’t have any impact on anything at all, except me.
I was wrong. If I had known that for every pound of beef I did not eat, I would save anywhere from 2,500 to 5,000 gallons of water, I would have been moved. It’s a good idea to save water; we are depleting our underground aquifers faster than we are replenishing them. The largest one, the Ogallala, which covers a vast part of the country from the Midwest to the mountain states, is being depleted by 13 trillion gallons a year. It is going to run out. Northwest Texas is already dry. They can’t get any water from their wells.
John Robbins points out that in the 1980s and 1990s, to conserve water, most of us went to low-flow showerheads. If you take a daily seven-minute shower, he says, and you have a 2-gallon-per-minute low-flow showerhead, you use about 100 gallons of water per week, or 5,200 gallons of water per year. If you had used the old-fashioned 3-gallon-per-minute showerhead, I calculate you would have used 7,644 gallons of water per year. So by going low flow, you saved almost 2,500 gallons of water per year. Wonderful. But by giving up one pound of beef that year, you’d save maybe double that. You’d save more water than you would by not showering at all for six months! And that’s just one of the environmental impacts you’d have.
The modern factory farming system is a prolific consumer of fossil fuel and a prolific producer of poisonous wastes. Up to 100,000 animals are herded together on huge feedlots. These animals do not graze on grass, as picture books tell us; they can’t graze at all. Feedlots are crowded, filthy, stinking places with open sewers, unpaved roads and choking air. The animals would not survive at all but for the fact that they are fed huge amounts of antibiotics. It is now conceded that the antibiotics fed to cattle are the main cause of antibiotic resistance in people, as the bacteria constantly in these environments evolve to survive them. The cattle are fed prodigious quantities of corn. At a feedlot of a mere 37,000 cows, 25 tons of corn are dumped every hour. It takes 1.2 gallons of oil to make the fertilizer used for each bushel of that corn. Before a cow is slaughtered, she will eat 25 pounds of corn a day; by the time she is slaughtered she will weigh more than 1,200 pounds. In her lifetime she will have consumed, in effect, 284 gallons of oil. Today’s factory-raised cow is not a solar-powered ruminant but another fossil fuel machine.
And she will produce waste. Livestock now produces 130 times the amount of waste that people do. This waste is untreated and unsanitary. It bubbles with chemicals and diseasebearing organisms. It overpowers nature’s ability to clean it up. It’s poisoning rivers, killing fish and getting into human drinking water. 65% of California’s population is threatened by pollution in drinking water just from dairy cow manure. It isn’t just cows that produce this waste. Factory-raised hogs produce four times the waste in North Carolina as the 6.5 million people of that state do. Even the oceans are polluted: 7,000 square miles of the Gulf of Mexico are a dead zone.
There are more environmental impacts. Cattle don’t spend their entire lives in feedlots. When they are young, they graze. Where do they graze? Well, more than two-thirds of the land area of the mountain states are used for grazing. 70% of the lands in western national forests are grazed; 90% of Bureau of Land Management land is grazed. These are public lands, lands that President Clinton didn’t even try to save. These lands are trampled by the cattle, compacting the soil. When it rains, the land doesn’t absorb the water. Instead, it runs off, taking away topsoil, forming deep gullies and damaging streambeds. The government protects the cattle by killing off any creature that might threaten the livestock. They poison, trap, snare, den, shoot or gun down the wildlife. Denning, by the way, is the practice by federal agents of pouring kerosene into the dens of animals and setting them on fire, burning the young animals alive in their nests. According to Robbins, agents kill badgers, black bear, bobcats, coyotes, gray fox, red fox, mountain lions, opossums, raccoons, skunks, beavers, porcupines, prairie dogs, blackbirds, cattle egrets and starlings using these methods. These activities take place on public lands, which were created in large part to protect the environment! Your tax dollars subsidize these activities.
I’m not done yet. We in the United States do not get all of our beef from the West. We import more than 200 million pounds of beef from Central America alone. Every second of every day, one football field of tropical rainforest is destroyed in order to produce 257 hamburgers. Every time you destroy rainforest land, you destroy rich plant and animal life, varieties of life we don’t even understand, and forms of which may provide the medicines we need to cure disease. Rainforests supply us with oxygen. They moderate our climates. When rainforests are destroyed, it’s only a matter of time before the land becomes desertified. Rainforests absorb some of the carbon dioxide we are spewing into the atmosphere.
We humans have increased the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by 25% compared with any other period when humans were on this planet. Most of that has taken place in the last 50 years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, consisting of some of the best scientists in the world, says global warming is a fact. If uncontrolled, we will have ecosystem collapses, crop failures, weather disasters, coastal flooding, the spreading of previously controlled diseases, the death of coral reefs and new insect pests. Some of these things are starting to happen already. Coral reefs are dying. Insect pests are spreading out of their range and killing off new kinds of trees. Weather patterns are changing. Some places have had extreme weather events, with billions of dollars of losses. Some island people have had to abandon their islands because rising seas have salinated their underground aquifers.
Carbon dioxide is largely produced by the burning of fossil fuels, especially coal, and especially our use of inefficient vehicles for transportation. But not often mentioned is the fossil fuel used to raise farm animals. As I said earlier, a factory cow is a fossil fuel machine, not a solar-powered ruminant whose wastes fertilize the fields to produce more grass for the cow to eat. When you eat beans, for example, you use 1/27 the amount of fossil fuel to produce a calorie of energy as you do when you eat beef. You get the same food energy producing only 4% of the carbon dioxide that a person eating beef does. Another fact we don’t talk about: cattle produce almost one fifth of global methane emissions. Cattle fart. Big time. Their gas is methane. Methane is actually 24 times as potent as carbon dioxide in causing climate chaos.
There’s another major environmental consequence of our factory system of animal raising: that’s the matter of species extinctions. It is true that species die off all the time. Normally, the Earth has lost 10 to 25 species per year. But in the billions of years of life on this Earth, we have had five periods of major extinctions; the last one was 67 million years ago, when, possibly because of a meteor colliding with the Earth, we lost the dinosaurs. But now there’s a sixth extinction, and it is not caused by a meteor, but by human beings. And this is a big one; we are losing several thousand species per year, and maybe tens of thousands. We think of mammals that are endangered, and 25% of mammalian species are endangered. But what’s much more endangered, or wiped out already, are the plants, including varieties of plankton, fungi, bacteria and insects, that are fundamental to all so-called higher forms of life. All life will unravel if these creatures are wiped out.
The driving force behind all these extinctions is the destruction of wildlife habitat, especially the rainforests. The driving force behind the destruction of the rainforests is livestock grazing. The leading cause of species in the United States being threatened or eliminated is livestock grazing. A 1997 study of endangered species in the southwestern United States by the Fish and Wildlife Service found that half the species studied were threatened by cattle ranching.
You and I cannot change all this. We are not going to be able to get a bill through Congress outlawing factory farming. Yet EarthSave as an organization believes we can still have a dramatic effect: We believe that you can protect your health and protect the environment one bite at a time.
Let’s review what I’ve said here: By not eating beef– and other farm animals as well–you:
save massive amounts of water – 3,000 to 5,000 gallons of water for every pound of beef you avoid,
avoid polluting our streams and rivers better than any other single recycling effort you do,
avoid the destruction of topsoil,
avoid the destruction of tropical forest,
avoid the production of carbon dioxide. (Your average car produces 3 kg/day of CO2. To clear rainforest to produce beef for one hamburger produces 75 kg of CO2. Eating one pound of hamburger does the same damage as driving your car for more than three weeks);
reduce the amount of methane gas produced. (I imagine the next bumper sticker: stop farts, don’t eat beef);
reduce the destruction of wildlife habitat, and
help to save endangered species.
That’s a pretty good day’s work, for just what you don’t put in your mouth.

Steve Boyan PhD recently retired from his post as a political science professor at University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He has published two books on environmental issues

Sabtu, 21 Juni 2008

ISO 14001 Environment ( part 2 )

Benefits

Certifying your company's environmental management system to ISO 14001 means that a third party, such as BSI, has assessed that it meets the requirements set out in the standard.

Certification to ISO 14001 allows you to:

  • Demonstrate a commitment to achieving legal and regulatory compliance to regulators and government
  • Demonstrate your environmental commitment to stakeholders
  • Demonstrate an innovative and forward thinking approach to customers and prospective employees
  • Increase your access to new customers and business partners
  • Better manage your environmental risks, now and in the future
  • Potentially reduce public liability insurance costs
  • Enhance your reputation

For particular industries, pressure is now being exerted by many large organizations, such as original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) who expect their suppliers to adopt environmentally-friendly practices and may mandate ISO 14001 certification as a licence to operate.

If you want to take the implementation and certification of an EMS slowly, the BS 8555 STEMS scheme allows you to phase the management system in and assess how you’re performing at each step on the path. Once completed, it still results in achieving ISO 14001 certification.

Training

We are experts in training as well as assessment and have a network of public and in-house courses dedicated to teaching you the skills you need before, during and after registration to the standard.

Steps to certification

Implementing a management system of any kind is a significant undertaking for any organization. However, there are some common tools you can use and a common process to follow during implementation and the route towards certification.

We offer a comprehensive range of services to help businesses understand and implement the internationally recognized environmental standard ISO 14001. These build on the requirements of ISO 14001 by breaking down the requirements into manageable steps:

1. Choose the standard

Initially you should read ISO 14001:2004 Environmental Management Systems - Specification with guidance for use. Download our free guidance document for your immediate reference.

Talk to us - we can provide you with information and support in finding the right solution for your company.

2. Develop your environmental policy

Your environmental policy will state your commitment to compliance with legal and regulatory demands, continual improvement and the prevention of pollution. You should make this policy available to your customers and the public.

3. Review and produce objectives

At this stage you should identify the elements of your business that impact on the environment, establish access to relevant environmental legislation and regulations and produce objectives and targets for environmental improvement and a management programme to achieve them.

4. Training

Once you have assembled a team and agreed your strategy it’s crucial to get understanding and involvement from the top down. Our training offers a comprehensive programme of training courses for each key step, which can be tailored to a company’s size and needs. Read more about training.

5. Implementation and assessment

As an accredited certification body our Client Managers can check in with you at key stages to ensure your implementation is running smoothly and to identify any gaps or areas for improvement. The initial registration to ISO 14001 involves a two-stage assessment process, including a document review and a site visit.

You should arrange the initial assessment with your registrar. It's often a good idea to include a pre-assessment, designed to act as a practice assessment. Following the two-stage initial assessment, the assessor will determine whether you should be recommended for registration.

6. Certification and beyond

Once the assessment has been successfully completed, we’ll issue a certificate of registration, clearly explaining the scope of your management system. The certificate is valid for three years, and your assessor will visit you regularly to help you make sure you remain compliant, and support you in the continual improvement of your systems.

Other related services

Integrated management systems
ISO 14001 is designed to be compatible with other management systems standards and specifications which you might already have or plan to implement, such as:

Our Integrated Management service allows you to integrate them seamlessly and can give excellent value for money.

Next steps
Select your country site for further information on the services and products offered in your region. Alternatively, view our global office directory to contact your local office direct.

Source : http://www.bsi-global.com/en/Assessment-and-certification-services

ISO 14001 Environment ( part 1 )

The international standard that specifies a process for controlling and improving an organization's environmental performance.

Overview
ISO 14001 is an internationally accepted standard that sets out how you can go about putting in place an effective Environmental Management System (EMS). The standard is designed to address the delicate balance between maintaining profitability and reducing environmental impact; with the commitment of your entire organization, it can enable you to achieve both objectives.

What’s in ISO 14001:

  • General requirements
  • Environmental policy
  • Planning implementation and operation
  • Checking and corrective action
  • Management review

This means you can identify aspects of your business that impact on the environment and understand those environmental laws that are relevant to your situation. The next step is to produce objectives for improvement and a management programme to achieve them, with regular reviews for continual improvement. We can then periodically assess the system and, if compliant, register your company or site to ISO 14001.

Who is it relevant to?

Environmental impact is becoming an increasingly important issue across the globe, with pressure to minimize that impact coming from a number of sources: local and national governments, regulators, trade associations, customers, employees and shareholders. Social pressures are also building up from the growing array of interested parties, such as consumer, environmental and minority non-governmental organizations (NGOs), academia and neighbours.

So ISO 14001 is relevant to every organization, including:

  • Single site to large multi-national companies
  • High risk companies to low risk service organizations
  • Manufacturing, process and the service industries; including local governments
  • All industry sectors including public and private sectors
  • Original equipment manufacturers and their suppliers

Source : http://www.bsi-global.com/en/Assessment-and-certification-services

Kamis, 19 Juni 2008

Eight Ways to Green Your Road Trip

Eight Ways to Green Your Road Trip

Save fuel, save money and cut global warming pollution


Peak driving season, when many Americans hit the road to visit relatives or see the sights, is now in full swing. With U.S. gas prices topping $4 a gallon in some places — and likely to edge up more during summer's high demand — you may want to consider taking more efficient mass transportation.

But if you travel by car, you can still cut your fuel usage, save money and reduce your carbon footprint by driving smart.

1. Look into going by train or bus instead of by car or plane.

Taking a train or a bus, instead of driving or flying, results in less global warming pollution per person for the miles traveled (and may cost less, too).

On average, taking a trip by bus produces the least amount of greenhouse gas per passenger mile, followed by train travel, then air. Cars, light trucks and motorcycles contribute the most to global warming pollution.

Put another way:

  • Air travel results in nearly two times as much global warming pollution as intercity bus travel.
  • Rail produces slightly more greenhouse gas emissions than buses.
  • Cars, trucks and motorcycles produce three times the pollution of buses.

These comparisons assume the vehicles are not filled to capacity on average. Trains come out even better in comparison to planes when both are full. (Note that Amtrak offers discounts on some routes for people over age 62.)

2. If you decide on a road trip, get your car in good shape.

Getting better gas mileage is no longer just about cutting greenhouse gas emissions. It's also about saving some serious money.

By following these rules of thumb, you will save gas and money — and your car will last longer.

  • Keep your engine tuned properly. Checking spark plugs, oxygen sensors, air filters, hoses and belts are a few examples of maintenance that can save a vehicle owner up to 165 gallons of gas per year — for a potential savings of $655 a year (based on 12,000 miles of driving per year and $3.97 a gallon, nationwide average as of 6/2/2008).
  • Check the tires. Have your wheels aligned and keep your tires properly inflated. Low tire pressure wastes over two million gallons of gasoline in the U.S. every day. Keeping your tires properly inflated raises your car's gas mileage by about 3.3 percent.

3. If you're renting, choose a fuel efficient car.

The rental car business is slowly turning over a green leaf. Many of the major national rental companies (such as Avis, Budget, Enterprise and Hertz) are offering a small number of fuel-sipping hybrids like the Toyota Prius in selected cities.

If a hybrid is not available, a subcompact, compact or economy car usually goes easier on the gas and is less costly to rent than a larger vehicle.

Get more details at Yahoo's Green Center and find the top cars by green rating to help you select a rental car that meets your family's needs.

4. Plan your trip well.

Part of the fun of a road trip is the adventure of exploring unknown territory. But getting lost and going miles out of your way is no fun — and wastes precious gas. So map out your route and keep maps handy to recheck.

A car navigation system is one high-tech way to keep on track in unfamiliar areas and get to your destination without wasting time and fuel.

5. Pile your friends and family in the same car.

Is one big, packed car better than two small, half-empty cars? The answer depends on the average gas mileage of the vehicles being compared.

But in general, if the larger car has a fuel economy at least half that of the two small cars, then it is more efficient to take the one large car. Here's the math.

Take this hypothetical example: an SUV that gets 15 mpg on average versus two cars that get 30 mpg. For two people on a 30-mile trip, you'd burn roughly two gallons of gas in the SUV , and you'd also burn two gallons in the two cars (one gallon per car times two cars).

So in this case, the two options consume the same amount of gas. If the SUV had higher gas mileage, it would be the better option, and if it had lower gas mileage, it would be the worse option.

The average car in the U.S. carries 1.6 passengers, so if you carry more than that, you're helping to reduce the nation's carbon footprint. Plus, you can pool expenses and save on gasoline.

6. When you're finally on the road, drive gently.

You can increase your gas mileage by as much as 50 percent for highway driving (and by five percent for stop-and-go city driving) simply by accelerating and decelerating smoothly and slowly. Aggressive driving, such as mashing down the accelerator or the brake, uses an extra 125 gallons a year on average — so by driving gently you can save $496 a year in today's prices.

7. Follow the speed limit.

You'd be surprised at how much fuel is squandered by driving over 60 miles per hour. Generally, each 5 mph over 60 mph you go is like paying an extra 20 cents per gallon of gas.

To keep your speed down while taking in more local color, consider taking less-traveled back roads, rather than the Interstates. It's easier to keep the speedometer below 60 mph when other cars aren't whizzing by you at 85 miles an hour!

8. Avoid unnecessary idling.

When you are unloading or packing your car, turn off the engine. An idling car gets zero miles to the gallon and contributes to global warming pollution. Contrary to popular belief, restarting your car does not burn more fuel than leaving it idling.

Tuning your car's engine, driving the speed limit and not driving aggressively can improve your gas mileage.
Tuning your car's engine, driving the speed limit and not driving aggressively can improve your gas mileage.

Source :http://www.edf.org/article.cfm?contentID=7910

Global Warming, a real issue?

by seminarian

Doug Moo has been teaching the winterim class on the book of James at The Master’s Seminary this week. One of the points upon which he launched into application is the idea of “widows and orphans” in Scripture which represents the helpless and needy. To this, he discussed global warming, and how it is our Christian response to curb it now because it will impact the poor/needy most.

I’m going to simply use the issue as an opportunity to illustrate principles of interpretation and a discussion of conviction. To do this I’ll interact with a few statistics of environmentaldefense.org:

1Rank of 2006 as hottest year on record in the continental United States.

We have not been keeping reliable temperature records except for the last one hundred years, and even these don’t match the UN IPCC model which expected a much higher change in temperature. What can we reasonably deduce from the fact that temperatures are higher now? Is this a cycle that will reverse, or is it a trend?

1Rank of America as top global warming polluter in the world.

Is this as compelling as it seems? We can expect one of the largest economies, even if more efficient and with higher controls, to be the top polluters. The economy of the US is the largest in the world in terms of GDP. This isn’t to say that we can’t do better and should, but the statistic is not astounding nor unexpected.

20%Percent increase of America’s carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels since 1990.

There has been a 20% increase over 17 years, which seems to be growing slower than the economy. Let us assume that global warming is an issue and that carbon dioxide emissions do perfectly correlate. If the percentage increase in co2 has been declining over the recent years, and as new technologies of alternate and cleaner energy become more and more accepted, then there is a reasonable expectation that despite future economic growth, the co2 emissions will eventually be on the decline.

15%Percent increase of America’s carbon dioxide emissions forecasted by 2020 if we do not cap pollution.

So the previous statistic was 20% over 17 years, and this is 15% over 13. This is actually a smaller year-to-year increase. Not only that, but this is assumed with no cap whatsoever. So, apparently if we do nothing about emissions, the rate of increase is on the decline.

80%Percent decrease in U.S. global warming pollution required by 2050 to prevent the worst consequences of global warming.

78 Number of days by which the US fire season has increased over the past 20 years - tied closely to increased temperatures and earlier snowmelt.

200 million Number of people around the world who could be displaced by more intense droughts, sea level rise and flooding by 2080.

358 Number of U.S. mayors (representing 55 million Americans) who have signed the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement pledging to meet or beat Kyoto goals in their communities.

0 Number of federal bills passed to cap America’s global warming pollution.

1 Number of times President Bush has mentioned “climate change” or “global warming” in his previous six State of the Union speeches.

To conclude, it has not been determined with certainty that global warming is an issue. It has also not been persuasively argued that global warming is out of control. There is a possibility, and a very good possibility at that, but at what percentage of certainty will we become convinced?

This is what I mean by interpretation. Even when approaching the Bible, which is clear, we must acknowledge a degree of uncertainty. Sometimes we forget that there is uncertainty, not in the reality of whether something exists or not, but whether we are right in concluding that on the basis of the data and evidence. There either is global warming or there isn’t. The world was either created in 6 literal days or it wasn’t. Everyone must weigh the evidence and people come to different conclusions.

However, and here the a major application, we must come to a conclusion. We must come up with convictions, especially without all of the data and certainty, for this is the nature of faith. We should spend our energies and our faculties in this endeavor. We will not be exonerated or let off by our naivete, but demonstrate by our searching the earnestness of our inquiry. We must do all things in faith, and when we decide, we must be fully convinced in our own mind (Rom 14:5).

Though the facts are not in for global warming, I don’t think it is an issue of importance, because I don’t believe it is an issue. Yet, I respect those that are campaigning for what they believe will protect and benefit those whose care has been entrusted us.

Source :http://seminarian.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/global-warming-a-real-issue/